MAHESH KUMAR S/O SHRI KALICHARAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15756/2025 · 2025-12-10
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36878 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36878 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50169] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 15756/2025 Mahesh Kumar S/o Shri Kalicharan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Parsan Police Station Aata, Tehsil Kakni, District Jalon Uttar Pradesh. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P. with Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy. G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 10/12/2025 The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.136/2022 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (West) for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 302 & 34 of I.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and he is behind the bars since 20.03.2022. Counsel further submits that there are no eyewitnesses in the present case, the case is entirely based on circumstantial evidence and the statements of the witnesses have already been recorded before the learned Trial Court. During the course of investigation, a wooden stick (lakdi ka fanta) was recovered, but the FSL report does not implicate the petitioner in any manner and the other
[2025:RJ-JP:50169] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15756/2025] co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court and a co-ordinate bench of this Court. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused- petitioner, namely Mahesh Kumar S/o Shri Kalicharan, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /11