IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 RSA-2100-1999 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.08.2025 Banarsi Dass ...Appellant Versus Baljit Singh and others ...Respondents RSA-3310-1999 (O&M) Banarsi Dass ...Appellant Versus Gurjant Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present : Mr.Kashmir Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant, in both cases. Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 5 (in RSA-2100-1999) and for respondents No.1 to 3 (in RSA-3310-1999). Respondents No.6 and 7 (in RSA-2100-1999) and respondents No.4 and 5 (in RSA-3310-1999) need not to serve vide order dated 30.04.2001. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL , J. (Oral) 1. As per office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back unserved for want of correct/complete address. Learned counsel for the appellant also submits that his client is not in contact with him. 2. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, with liberty reserved to the appellant (in both cases) to seek revival of the same at any stage in accordance with law. 3. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. August 21, 2025 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) anil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No ANIL KUMAR 2025.08.22 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document