Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36867 (KAR)

V. PRASHNATH (MEMBERSHIP NO.454) v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/34716/2024 · 2025-02-04

K S Hemalekha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5166 WP No. 34716 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 34716 OF 2024 (CS-EL/M) BETWEEN: 1. V. PRASHANTH (MEMBERSHIP NO.454) S/O VENKATAY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O URUGUDIGE, KELAKULI POST AND VILLAGE, KOPPA TALUK, CHIKMAGALURU DIST-577 126. 2. HEMALATHA (MEMBERSHIP NO.183) W/O PRAKASH RAJ, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O KUREGUNDI TALAMAKKI, KOPPA TALUK-577 126, CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K PRASANNA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-500 001. Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5166 WP No. 34716 of 2024 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY 3RD FLOOR, TTMC A BLOCK, K.H. ROAD, SHANTINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577 126. 4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577 126. 5. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., KESAVE, KOPPA TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577 126 (SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT-1959) 6. RETURNING OFFICER PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., KESAVE, KOPPA TALUK, CHICKMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 126 (SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT-1959) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA FOR R1, R3, R4 & R6; SRI. T.L. KIRAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R5 - SERVED, UNREPRESENTED) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5166 WP No. 34716 of 2024 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO 6 TO INCLUDE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE ELIGIBLE VOTERS LIST AND PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO CONTEST AND VOTES IN THE ELECTIONS TO THE R-5 WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO BE HELD ON 29.12.2024 ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER The petitioners are seeking for the following prayers:- "Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to 6 to include the name of the petitioners in the eligible voters list and permit the petitioners to contest and votes in the elections to the respondent No.5 which is scheduled to be held on 29.12.2024 at Annexure-A". 2. This Court by way of an interim arrangement on 18.12.2024 permitted the petitioners to cast their votes in - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:5166 WP No. 34716 of 2024 the ensuing election scheduled on 29.12.2024 subject to final outcome of this petition. 3. Heard Sri K. Prasanna Shetty, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Siddharth Babu Rao, learned AGA for respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 6 and Sri T.L. Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 4. Respondent No.5 though served has chosen to remain absent. 5. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the election has been held as scheduled on 29.12.2024 and the petitioners have cast their votes. 6. Reiterating various contentions raised in the writ petition, it is mainly urged that no individual notice is issued to the petitioners while the names of the petitioners are excluded in the final voters list and the respondents have acted against mandate requirement of Rule 13 (D) (2-A) of the Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Rules, 1960 (‘the Rules’ for short). It is urged that the petitioners - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:5166 WP No. 34716 of 2024 should be treated as eligible voters and their votes to be counted as valid votes. 7. No material is forthcoming to indicate the compliance of aforementioned rules. It is brought to the notice of this Court that under identical circumstances, the Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of H.S. Raju and others Vs. State of Karnataka and others1 (H.S. Raju) has permitted the votes to be counted and election results to be announced, keeping open all contentions to be adjudicated in the appropriate forum under Section 70 (2) (c) of the Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959 (‘the Act’ for short). Whether the petitioners would incur any disqualification to vote or not is a question of fact to be decided by the appropriate authority under Section 70 (2) (c) of the Act and hence, the following: ORDER i. Writ petition is disposed of. 1 2022 (4) AKR 775 - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:5166 WP No. 34716 of 2024 ii. The Returning Officer to count the votes, including the votes cast by petitioners and announce the results of the election, which was scheduled on 29.12.2024, if not already announced. iii. Aggrieved party is entitled to raise a dispute under Section 70 (2) (c) of the Act, if raised a dispute under the said provision, questioning the eligibility of the petitioners to vote in the election to the Board of the respondent – society, the said dispute shall be decided without being influenced by the interim order granted by this Court and it is made clear that granting of an interim order in favour of the petitioner would not give any finding on the eligibility of the petitioners to vote in the election of the Board of respondent – society. iv. The eligibility of the petitioners to vote in the election is kept open to be decided in a dispute, if any, raised in this regard. v. If any such dispute relating to the eligibility of the petitioners to vote in the election to the Board of the respondent-society is - 7 - NC: 2025:KHC:5166 WP No. 34716 of 2024 raised, the effect of holding the petitioners ineligible to vote and excluding such votes, on the final outcome of the election results shall also be taken into account before passing the final orders. vi. The vote cast by the petitioners shall be kept in a separate sealed box after counting. vii. This Court has not expressed any merits or demerits of the ineligibility of the petitioners. Sd/- JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA VS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 43 CT:SNN