1 2025:CGHC:44259 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1481 of 2021 1 - Thanda Ram Gond S/o Mahesh Ram Gond Aged About 63 Years R/o Sutarra, Sukhsagar Para, P.S. Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 2 - Dhan Singh Gond S/o Thanda Ram Gond Aged About 27 Years R/o Sutarra, Sukhsagar Para, P.S. Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 3 - Firat Das Mahant S/o Chaturdas Mahant Aged About 47 Years R/o Mohanpur, P.S. Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 4 - Akash Sharma S/o Mahaveer Sharma Aged About 33 Years R/o Bazar Mohalla, P.S. Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Superintendent Police Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 3 - Jitendra Kumar Patel S/o Lakhanlal Patel Aged About 35 Years Occupation Patwari R/o Sutarra, Sukhsagar Para, P.S. Katghora District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.09.02 10:54:38 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents/ State : Ms. Saumya Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 01.09.2025 1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer :- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the charge sheet alleged against the petitioners bearing Crime No. 305/2018 registered at police station Katghora, District Korba for offence U/S 294, 506, 186, 353 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. as well as Criminal Case registered against the petitioners before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Katghora, District Korba in Criminal Case No. 3317/2018, in the interest of Justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the charges have been framed against the present petitioners and the trial is pending before the learned trial Court, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition to which learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse to law. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, 3 the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed. 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice S. Bhilwar