APHC010606122010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI APPEAL SUIT NO: 1001/2010 Between: Nagula Bala Krishna Kumari Seelam Rama Krishna Died and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 1001/2010 Nagula Bala Krishna Kumari AND Seelam Rama Krishna Died and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): B NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3524] THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO:1001 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/7th defendant, being aggrieved from the judgment and decree dated 19.10.2010 passed in O.S.No.138 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Guntur. 2. Today, when the case is called, there is no representation. Even, at the revised call also, none appeared on either side. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2007 and is listed in the “Weekly Cause-list” 4. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 19.03.2025 MDP