( 2025:JHHC:34292 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10381 of 2025 ------ Ranbir Bhuiyan @ Ranvir Bhuiyan, aged about 27 years, S/o – Shri Govind Bhuiyan, R/o Village –Ranki Khurd, Salaiya Magarbandh, P.O. & P.S. –Satbarwa, District –Palamau, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 14.11.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. Case No. 74 of 2025 arising out of Satbarwa P.S. Case No.119 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 57 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 190, 191, 126, 127, 115, 117, 118, 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail and earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 10.07.2025 in B.A. No. 5713 of 2025. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the only fresh ground is that in the meanwhile, charge has been framed and in B.A. No. 5713 of 2025, the learned Addl. P.P. made an erroneous submission that there is direct allegation against the petitioner. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. on the other hand vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner of being involved in the murder of Arjun Mehta, therefore, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner ought not to be admitted to bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner and the chances of his absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail, the prayer for regular bail of the above-named petitioner is rejected for the same reasons as mentioned in the order 10.07.2025 in B.A. No. 5713 of 2025. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 14.11.2025 Sonu/Gunjan-