SHAMIM AKHTAR NADVI ALIAS SHAMIM AKHTAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6201/2025 · 2025-10-29
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36857 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36857 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:32492] -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 6201 of 2025
Shamim Akhtar Nadvi @ Shamim Akhtar, aged about 56 years, son of Late Md. Kashim, Resident of Road No. 5, Main Road, Jawahar Ngar, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum.
..... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
..... … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, A.P.P. ------
03/ 29.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mango P.S. Case No. 213 of 2025, registered for the offences under Section 64(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegations are made against the petitioner. He submits that in the FIR itself, it has been disclosed that on 05.09.2014, the petitioner has appointed the informant on the post of receptionist and from that time itself, the relationship was established. He then submits that allegations are made that now the petitioner has been relieved from the office of the petitioner and the petitioner has denied to solemnize the marriage with the informant. He next submits that the FIR has been lodged on
17.08.2025.
4.
Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that on the false pretext of marriage, the relationship was established.
[2025:JHHC:32492] -2-
5.
Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the informant was appointed as receptionist by the petitioner on 05.09.2014 and since then the allegation of establishing the physical relationship was made, however, the FIR has only been lodged on 17.08.2025 and it has been alleged that informant has been relieved from the office of the petitioner, I am inclined to provide the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6.
Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is hereby
directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today, and in the event of her surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Mango P.S. Case No. 213 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-29.10.2025 Amitesh/-