1 2025:CGHC:39372 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8476 of 2025 1 - Smt. Varsha Dalmiya W/o Sumit Dalmiya Aged About 44 Years R/o Kabir Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer And Secretary Under District Rationalization Committee, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Dharsinwa, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Dubey, Govt. Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 07/08/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 05.06.2025 (Annexure P/1), whereby the petitioner who is Teacher (LB) and is posted at Govt. Govt. Pre-Middle School, Kabir Nagar, Dharwinwa has not now posted at Govt. Pre-Middle School, Siltara, Dist- Raipur vide impugned order dated 05.06.2025 under the rationalization instructions. The said ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.08.08 20:02:05 +0530 2 transfer order was passed after after declaring her surplus there. The petitioner has moved her representation on 06.06.2025 and 12.06.2025 to the authorities concerned but his representation has not been considered till date. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner earlier filed WPS No. 7332/2025 which was dismissed vide order dated 09.07.2025 on the ground that no order of posting of the petitioner was issued at that time but as of now the posting order of the petitioner has been issued on 05.06.2025, which is under challenge in the present writ petition. He would further submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on 3 its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok