SMT. SHEELA DEVI W/O HARIMOHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/7564/2025 · 2025-12-10
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36852 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36852 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7564/2025
1. Smt. Sheela Devi W/o Harimohan, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Anchhapura, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan)
2. Smt. Gyarsi W/o Preetam, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Anchhapura, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan)
3. Smt. Sarupi Devi W/o Raghubeer, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Anchhapura, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 4. Smt. Kasturidevi W/o Shri Prakash, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Anchhapura, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 5. Rakesh S/o Prakash, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Anchhapura, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 6. Prakash S/o Natthulal, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Anchhapura, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 7. Preetam S/o Raghubeer, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Anchhapura, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 8. Vishnu S/o Prakash, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Anchhapura, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 9. Yogesh S/o Prakash, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Anchhapura, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan)
10. Harimohan S/o Shri Raghuveer, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Anchhapura, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Rameshwar Saini @ Bablu Saini S/o Shri Mangturam, R/o Anchhapura Hadiya, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7564/2025] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmikant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/12/2025
1. The present criminal misc. petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 03.06.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Mahwa, District Dausa by which the charges have been framed against the petitioners for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 323, 341, 325, 336, 307 and 302 IPC. 2. Admittedly, the order of framing the charge is a final order against which the revision petition is maintainable but inspite of filing a criminal revision petition, the instant misc. petition has been submitted under Section 528 BNSS. 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition be treated as criminal revision petition. 4. Accepting the aforesaid request made by counsel for the petitioner, this criminal misc. petition be treated as criminal revision petition. 5. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to file amended cause title within a period of three days from today. 6.
In case, the amended title is submitted within the above stipulated time, office is directed to place the same at the appropriate place in the file. 7. List this matter in next week, before the Bench having the roster pertaining to Criminal Revision. (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7564/2025]
8. For the statistical purpose, the present criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/50