Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36850 (AP)

Vendra Mutyavathi v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/28851/2018 · 2025-07-24

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010605302018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28851/2018 Between: 1. VENDRA MUTYAVATHI, W/O PAVAN CHAKRAVATHI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE R/O 7TH WARD, MALLETHOTA GUNUPUDI BHIMAVARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. MOLLETI LAKSHMI, W/O SRINIVAS AGED 28 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE R/O 7TH WARD, MALLETHOTA GUNUPUDI BHIMAVARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY (HOME DEPT) SECRETARIRAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM I TOWN POLICE STATION BHIMAVARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. MANEPALLI WSWARA PHANI KUMAR, S/O NAGESWARARAO AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. GOVT EMPLOYE R/O CITY MISSION MANAGER MUNNICIPAL OFFICE BHIMAVARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ order or orders by declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in registering the crime 2 vide. FIR No 233/2018 dated 04.07.2018 basing on the compliant of the 3rd respondent for the offences under Sec 427,353,506 R/w 34 IPC, which is illegally arbitrary, non-est in law, and violative of principles of natural justice, and consequently quash the Crime vide FIR No 233/2018 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners in crime vide FIR No 233/2018 dated 04.07.2018 register by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BS KARTIK PRASAD ESR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28851/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ order or orders by declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in registering the crime vide. FIR No 233/2018 dated 04.07.2018 basing on the compliant of the 3rd respondent for the offences under Sec 427,353,506 R/w 34 IPC, which is illegally arbitrary, non-est in law, and violative of principles of natural justice, and consequently quash the Crime vide FIR No 233/2018 and to pass…” 2. None represented for the petitioners. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the case in FIR No.233 of 2018 is referred as false and recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.07.2025 UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28851 of 2018 Dated.25.07.2025 UPS 216