ASHOK KUMAR S/O SHRI OM PRAKASH SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15710/2025 · 2025-10-14
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36846 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36846 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41885] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15710/2025 Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Om Prakash Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village - Post Hantara, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Education, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. District Education Officer, Dholpur (Raj.)
3. Panchayat Elementary Education Officer (Peeo), Puraini, District Dholpur (Raj.)
4. Chief Block Education Officer (Cbeo), Saipau, District Dholpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanmay Dhand For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishna, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/10/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed with following prayers:
“Hence prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further pleased to quash and set-aside impugned order dated 26.09.2025 (Annexure-6) and further be pleased to direct the respondents to abide by the spirit of the Rajasthan Educational Services Rules, 1970 and make appointments to the post of Head-Master as per the proper channel as prescribed under the Rules.”
2. Considered submissions of learned counsel for petitioner wherein he prays that due to some neurological disorder, it is not possible for the petitioner to perform officiating duties of the Head
[2025:RJ-JP:41885] (2 of 2) [CW-15710/2025] Master as assigned to him vide order dated 26.09.2025 (Annexure-6).
3. Issue notice to respondents and Mr. Gopal Krishan, AGC accepts notice and puts in appearance on behalf of repsondents.
4. After considering prayer learned counsel for respondents submits that he will communicate to the respondents that if petitioner is not desirous to perform his duties as Head Master (officiating) then, person next to him would be given charge of Head Master (officiating). He also admits that present petitioner is not promoted on the post of Head Master.
5. Having considered the submission made by learned counsel for respondents, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondents to relieve present petitioner from officiating charge of Head Master and appoint any other person available in the school or as per administrative exigency, and this order will not come in the way of any future career progression of present petitioner.
6. With aforesaid, the writ petition and misc. application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /187