APHC010603902024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 18/2025 Between: D N Chennaraja Chetty Smt T.Padmavathi Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Courts Act, 1971 against the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 14.03.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No Ms.S.Parineetha, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner’s Appeal has been rejected by the authorities and in view of the same, there is nothing remains for adjudication. Hence, prayed to close the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 18/2025 ...PETITIONER AND ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Contemnor: VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Act, 1971 against the respondent for willful disobedience of the order sed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5886 of 2024. Ms.S.Parineetha, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner’s Appeal has been rejected by the authorities and in view of the same, there is nothing remains for adjudication. Hence, prayed to close the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...CONTEMNOR Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Act, 1971 against the respondent for willful disobedience of the order .5886 of 2024. Ms.S.Parineetha, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner’s Appeal has been rejected by the authorities and in view of the same, there is nothing remains for adjudication. Hence, prayed to close the Contest Case giving liberty to the petitioner to question the said rejection order. Recording the said submission, as the authorities have complied with the orders of this Court, there is no contempt as alleged. Hence, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to question the rejection order before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 06.03.2025 MP 160 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO:18 of 2025 Date: 06.03.2025 MP