[2025:RJ-JP:44426] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11174/2025 Jai Singh S/o Mool Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dadiya, Police Station Arain, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined in Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Martand Pratap Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 06/11/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.83/2025 registered at Police Station Arain, District Ajmer for the offences under Section 3/25 of Arms Act & Section 111(2)(a) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:44426] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11174/2025] 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Jai Singh S/o Mool Singh be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his appearance before the Court concerned on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. Considering the criminal antecedents of the accused- petitioner, it is directed that in case, if he is found to be involved in offences of similar nature, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail granted to the accused-petitioner by this Court. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GARIMA /60