IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 80 OF 2025 Between: Annem Anjireddy, S/o. Bodduvanipalem, 2nd Ward, Prakasam District. Annem Jogireddy, R/o. D. No. 2-40A, ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 3. The Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Near Pratur Cross Road, Tadepalli, Guntur District. 4. The Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation Ltd., Vijayawada, NTR District. 5. The Collector And District Magistrate, Prakasam District, Ongole. 6. The Project Director, District Water Management Agency (DWMA), Ongole, Prakasam District. 7. The Project Director, Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation Ltd., Ongole, Prakasam District. 8. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Korisapadu Mandal, Korisapadu, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS f Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in withholding the payment of Rs. 30,56,315/- (Thirty Lakhs Fifty-Six Thousand Three Hundred and Fifteen), payable to the petitioner, for the work done pertaining to Development of Development of Housing Colony 2 at Pamidipadu Village in Korisapadu Mandal as bad, illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and against the Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the amount of Rs. 30,56,315/- (Thirty Lakhs Fifty-Six Thousand Three Hundred and Fifteen) for the works executed by the petitioner. one lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2fi Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 01/12/2024, and to pay the amount payable to the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BANDLA PAVAN (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4 & 5: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 to 8: The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 80 of 2025 ORDER: There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it evinces that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. in SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTYxREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Bandia Pavan Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj Rural Dev, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP for Finance & Planning, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies TF 'il . HIGH COURT DATEb:29/01/2025 ORDER # % g 0 7 FEB 2025 3 ^ ^ Current Section WP.No.80 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS