Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3684 (PNJ)

BIMLA DEVI v. VIVEK AGGARWAL IRS

COCP/5862/2025 · 2026-03-05

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN T 132 Bimla Devi Vivek Agg Haryana, P CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU of order d Bench of th of Haryana the followi counsel for COCP-5862-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.5862 o Date of decision : a Devi Versus k Aggarwal, IRS, Director Genera ana, Panchkula AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NID Mrs. Jai Shree Kaushik, Advoc Mr. Devender S. Punia, Advoca for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has b rder dated 05.12.2024 (Annexure P h of this Court in CWP-24439-2024 tit aryana and others”, whereby the writ pe ollowing observations on the basis of sel for the State, which reads as under : “Learned State contends that the petitio period of her husband's 31.07.2018 as duty peri by the Department so far purpose has been recei LTC for the Block Year the Department on his be 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5862 of 2025 (O & M) ision :-05.03.2026 …..Petitioner eneral, Elementary Education …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA Advocate for dvocate l. A.G., Haryana. n has been filed alleging violation re P-1) passed by a co-ordinate 024 titled as “Bimla Devi vs. State writ petition was disposed of with sis of statement made by learned nder :- tate counsel, on instructions, titioner's prayer for treating the nd's service from 10.08.2017 to period has not been considered o far since no application for the received, nor has the benefit of ear 2016-19 been claimed from is behalf. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-5862-2025 (O & M) 2. He further conte for grant of benefit of accepted, as the benef released to the petitione 01.07.2017. He supera effect from 30.06.2019, a prior thereto on 01.07.20 3. He also contend due on 01.07.2019 on co prior to retirement will b law laid down in The KPTCL and others x C.P 2023 SCC Online SC 40 issued by the Supreme dated 06.09.2024, pass 2021, that, The judgmen given effect to in case o of the judgment, that is account one increment w 01.05.2023. Enhanced p to 30.04.2023 will not be as well as revised pensio increments will be given 4. He further conte make a representation b Director General, Eleme weeks from today regard salary from 10.08.2017 the Block Year 2016-19 passing a speaking ord within four week representation…..” 2 ontends that the second prayer it of 3 ACP has already been enefit has been ordered to be ioner's husband with effect from perannuated from service with 19, and the increment due to him 07.2018 has been sanctioned. tends that benefit of increment n completion of one vear service ill be sanctioned in terms of the The Director (Admn. and HR) x C.P. Mundinamani and others, C 401, as well as the directions reme Court vide interim order, passed in SLP (C) No.4722 of gment dated 11.04.2021 wall be se of third parties from the date at is the pension by taking into ent will be payable on and after ed pension for the period prior ot be paid, and arrears of salary ensionary benefits on the basis of iven within four weeks ontends that the petitioner can on before the second respondent lementary Education, within two garding the remaining claims of 017 to 31.07.2018, and LTC for 19, which will be decided by order in accordance with law eeks of receiving the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document necessary c dated 05.3.2 produced b record. Cop Registry to Writ Court with while authority, n may be disp to the petiti per law. by learned disposed o the said Spe March 05, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-5862-2025 (O & M) Learned counsel for the res ssary compliance has been made while 05.3.2026; thus, no cause survives in th Copy of the aforesaid Speak ced by the learned counsel for the re d. Copy thereof is supplied to learned stry to tag/paginate the same at appropri Learned counsel for the petiti Court order dated 05.12.2024 (Annex while passing a Speaking Order dated rity, nothing survives in the present con be disposed of. Learned counsel submit petitioner to challenge the said Speaki In view of the above noted fact arned counsel for the petitioner, the p sed of. However, liberty is granted to said Speaking Order dated 05.3.2026 as p Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 3 e respondent-State submits that while passing a Speaking Order es in the present petition. Speaking order dated 05.3.2026 the respondent-State is taken on learned counsel for the petitioner. propriate place in the paper-book. petitioner submits that since the nnexure P-1) has been complied ated 05.3.2026 by the respondent- sent contempt petition and the same ubmits that liberty may be granted Speaking Order dated 05.3.2026 as ed facts and the submissions made , the present contempt petition is nted to the petitioner to challenge as per law. any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document