APHC010604382007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 19805/2007 Between: 1. KARRI RAVANAMMA, KOTANANDURU MANDAL, E.G.DISTRICT, W/O.KUNCHE SRINIVAS UNEMPLOYEE R/O.BILLA NANDURU VILLAGE, KOTANANDURU MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR E G DISTRICT 2 OTHERS, S/O.LATE SYED JAHANGIR PVT BUSINESS R/O.KAGAZNAGAR, RR DISTRICT. 2. THE PROJECT OFFICER INTEGRATED CHILDREN DEVELOPMENT, SOCIETY (ICDS), TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. SMT KOMALA L LEELA KUMARI, W/O.RAJAVARAHALU R/O.BILLANANDURU VILLAGE KOTANANDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in appointing the 3rd respondent as Anganwadi Worker to Billananduru village, Kotananduru Mandal, East Godavari District by ignoring the meritorious candidate is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the selection of the 3rd respondent as Anganwadi worker and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to appoint the petitioner as Anganwadi worker to Billananduru village of Kotananduru Mandal, East Godavari District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 25529 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the selection list issued by the 2nd respondent on 6.9.2007 in so far as the 3rd respondent appointment is concerned as Anganwadi worker to Billananduru village of Kotananduru Mandal, East Godavari District pending disposal of WP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO 2. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE 3. SURIBABU S(SPL SC FOR CT AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Siva Ram, learned counsel representing Sri N.Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 15th September, 2025 RKS