Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36838 (MAD)

SIVAKUMAR v. SAKTHIVEL

CRL OP/8205/2025 · 2025-04-24

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No. 8205 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.8205 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.5352 of 2025 Sivakumar ... Petitioner Vs. Sakthivel ..Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to withdraw the S.T.C.No.142 of 2021 from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Harur, Dharmapuri District and transfer the same to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Pradeep O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking transfer of S.T.C. No. 142 of 2021 from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Harur, Dharmapuri District to the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 8205 of 2025 perused the materials available on record. 3. The petitioner is the complainant and the respondent is the accused in S.T.C. No. 142 of 2021 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Harur, Dharmapuri District, for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The petitioner seeks transfer of the case on the ground that he has shifted his residence from Dharmapuri to Tiruppur. However, it is seen that the bank concerned and the respondent's residence are situated within the jurisdiction of the Trial Court at Harur, Dharmapuri District, and the respondent continues to reside there. The mere change in the petitioner’s residential address is not sufficient ground to warrant transfer of the proceedings, particularly when the respondent and other relevant witnesses are within the jurisdiction of the present Trial Court. Therefore, allowing such a transfer solely on the basis of convenience of the complainant would result in prejudice to the respondent and delay in the conduct of the trial. 4. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to transfer the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 8205 of 2025 S.T.C. No. 142 of 2021 from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Harur, Dharmapuri District to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Harur, Dharmapuri District, is directed to complete the trial in S.T.C. No. 142 of 2021 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 24.04.2025 Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order shk G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. shk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 8205 of 2025 To 1. The Judicial Magistrate, Harur, Dharmapuri District 2.The Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur. Crl.O.P.No.8205 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.5352 of 2025 24.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis