1 2025:CGHC:39388 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9220 of 2025 1 - Shivnandan Chauhan S/o Damodar Chauhan Aged About 48 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) Chemistry And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Dhurkot, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Lok Shikshan, Indrawati Bhawan, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector- Cum Presedent District Level Rationalization Committee, (Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti), Sakti District Sakti (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Sakti District Sakti (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 07/08/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 03.06.2025 (Annexure P/1), whereby the petitioner, who is Teacher (LB) and is posted at Govt. VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.08.08 14:37:31 +0530 2 Higher Secondary School, Dhurkot (D), District Sakti, has now been posted at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kirari, Block Malkharauda, District Sakti under the rationalization instructions. The said transfer order was passed after after declaring him surplus the there. The petitioner has moved his representation on 13.06.2025 before the respondent authorities, but his representation has not been considered till date. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in favour of the petitioner to move his representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its 3 own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved