Nadipalli Venkata Narasimha Rao v. Gudivada Anasuya [died]
SA/917/2008 · 2025-01-06
T Mallikarjuna Rao
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3683 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3683 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010021002008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 917/2008 Between: Nadipalli Venkata Narasimha Rao ...APPELLANT AND Gudivada Anasuya Died and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:
1. S SURENDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M S R SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/defendant under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the
Judgment and decree, dated 04.04.2008 passed in A.S.No.237 of 2003 on the file of learned III Additional District Judge’s Court, Kakinada, reversing the
judgment and decree, dated 01.09.2003 passed in O.S.No.50 of 1994 on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Kakinada.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of the appellant. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M.
3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal.
4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date:06.01.2025 MS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO.917 OF 2008 Date:06.01.2025
MS