Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36828 (CHH)

ASHWANI KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8484/2025 · 2025-07-29

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:37385 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8484 of 2025 1 - Ashwani Kumar Sahu S/o Gaya Ram Sahu Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Champaran, Post Champaran, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer And Secretary Under District Rationalization Committee Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Arang, District- Raipur (C.G.) 6 - The Headmaster Govt. Pre-Middle School, Guma, Block- Arang, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 30/07/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 05.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Pre Middle School, Bhurka ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.06 18:47:40 +0530 2 to Govt. Pre Middle School, Guna, under the rationalization instructions. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in an objective manner by passing reasoned order as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok