APHC010605062018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28908/2018 Between: B.V. Naresh ...PETITIONER AND Dravidian University Srinivasavanam and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. KOTESWARA RAO MUTHINENI (STANDING COUNSEL FOR DRAVIDIAN UNIVERSITY) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the Proc.No.DU/Estt/E/A C/01819 Dated 27.07.2018 issued by the 1st respondent citing the orders of the 2nd respondent dated 27.07.2018 not communicated to the petitioner even as on today as a measure of punishment and attaching stigma without proving the guilt as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, malafide and unconstitutional, violating Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and issue consequential directions directing the respondents to forthwith continue the petitioner as Academic Consultant / Assistant Professors till absorbing / regularizing the services of the petitioner as Assistant Professor in the existing vacancies in terms of similar directions rendered in Dated 28.02.2018 in IA No.1/2018 in WP.No.5979/2018 and orders dated 25.04.2018 in IA No.1/2018 in WP No.14781/2018 with all consequential benefits.” 2 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 28908 of 2018 16.04.2025 Mjl /*