Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36821 (CHH)

SHUBHA GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8661/2025 · 2025-08-05

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:39333 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8661 of 2025 1 - Shubha Gupta D/o Late Shri Rohit Kumar Gupta Aged About 31 Years Presently Posted As Food Inspector At Food Office District Koriya Office At Collectorate Koriya R/o Mahal Para, Near Sharma Hospital Baikunthpur, Tahsil - Baikunthpur District- Koriya (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate, Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Protection Department, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Baikunthpur, District- Koriya (C.G.) 4 - The Food Officer Baikunthpur, District- Koriya (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri JN Nande, Advocate. For State : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon ’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 06 .0 8 .2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition on the grievance that though the transfer order has been issued on 25.06.2025, the petitioner is not being relieved. 2. The issue regarding implementation of transfer order has been considered by this Court in the case of Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182, wherein relying upon several judgments of the Supreme Court it has been held by this Court that once the employee has been transferred it is required 2 to be complied with unless it is modified, varied or cancelled. Therefore, in these circumstances, either the transfer order has to be implemented or the State has the option to cancel, vary or modify or keep in abeyance. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that if the transfer order of the petitioner is still operative, the respondent authorities shall relieve the petitioner towards implementation of the transfer order. 4. It is also made clear that if any administrative exigency impede the petitioners' relieving, the petitioner shall be informed in writing. It will also remain open for the respondents to reconsider the issue of transfer on account of any administrative exigency. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder