HANSRAJ MEENA S/O SHRI BAJRANG LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5898/2021 · 2025-10-14
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36819 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36819 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42071] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.5898/2021 Hansraj Meena S/o Shri Bajrang Lal Meena, aged about 45 Years, Resident of Village Gudaliya Roopwas, Police Station Banetha, Tehsil Uniyara, District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor.
2. Superintendent of Police, Tonk, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
3. S.H.O. Police Station Banetha, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
4. Manraj Jat S/o Shri Kajod Mal Jat, Resident of Village Sangrampura, Police Station Banetha, District Tonk, Rajasthan. (Named Accused in FIR) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 14/10/2025
1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
2. The instant criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with alternative prayer either to quash and set aside FIR No.64/2021 registered with Police Station-Banetha, District-Tonk, or to transfer the investigation of the said FIR from Police Station-Banetha, District-Tonk to any other place and to further direct for fair and impartial investigation in the matter.
3. Pursuant to order dated 11.09.2024 passed by this Court as well as by earlier orders, direction was given to the learned Public Prosecutor to submit the factual report. In
[2025:RJ-JP:42071] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5898/2021] compliance thereof, learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report dated 28.09.2024 prepared by Station House Officer, Banetha, Tonk, which is taken on record.
4. As per the factual report, after completing investigation, the police authorities have already filed charge- sheet against the accused persons in the FIR on 31.10.2021 &
14.12.2021.
5. In view of above and more particularly, when nobody is there to present the petitioner to controvert the said facts, no cause of action for pursuing the instant criminal miscellaneous petition survives and the same is, hereby, dismissed.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/3