IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 144 CWP-8573-2025 Date of decision: 26.03.2025 ANIL KUMAR VERMA ….PETITIONER Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 05.12.2024 (Annexure P-1) whereby his claim for promotion has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner claims that in view of the Reservation Policy of the State Government for Group-A and Group-B post, the petitioner has been denied substantial benefit of promotion. The matter with respect to validity of instructions issued by State Government with respect to reservation in Group-A and Group-B post is already pending before this Court. 3. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana submits that claim of petitioner would be decided in terms of order to be passed by this Court in CWP-24608 of 2023. 4. Counsel for petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands disposed of. 26.03.2025 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL] manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.03.27 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document