[2025:RJ-JP:2463] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 640/2025 1. Shahrukh S/o Ishan, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Kulyana, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. 2. Ajru @ Ajrudin S/o Jaikam, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Kulyana, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 734/2025 Sarif @ Gullu S/o Samsu, R/o Village Kuliyana, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma, Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 17/01/2025 1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.200/2024, registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act, the accused-petitioners have preferred this anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 B.N.S.S. [2025:RJ-JP:2463] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-640/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the accused-petitioners were named by the other co-accused Waseem and the co-accused Waseem has already been enlarged on bail. There is no direct allegation against the accused-petitioners that the accused-petitioners were inducing the person by creating fake email i.d. and advertisements and getting money from the persons induced. The accused-petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not required, therefore, the anticipatory bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail applications. 4. Considering the fact that the mobile phones were recovered from other co-accused, who have already been enlarged on bail. The accused-petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation and the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required, without commenting anything on the merits of the case and considering the above facts, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail applications of the accused-petitioners. 5. Accordingly, these anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 B.N.S.S. are allowed. It is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioners namely:- 1. Shahrukh S/o Ishan, 2. Ajru @ Ajrudin S/o Jaikam, and 3. Sarif @ Gullu S/o Samsu in connection with FIR No.200/2024, registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two [2025:RJ-JP:2463] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-640/2025] sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that these petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/33-34