DULAL UDDIN AHMED AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
WP(C)/924/2025 · 2026-07-20
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3681 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3681 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010202812025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/924/2025 DULAL UDDIN AHMED AND ANR S/O- LATE MAFIZ UDDIN AHMED
VILLAGE- KHUDIMARI PT.-II
P.O.- KHUDIMARI P.S.- GAURIPUR
DISTT.- DHUBRI ASSAM.
2: SUMAN AHMED S/O- DULAL UDDIN AHMED
VILLAGE- KHUDIMARI PT.-II
P.O.- KHUDIMARI P.S.- GAURIPUR
DISTT.- DHUBRI ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
REVENUE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
Page No.# 2/3 DHUBRI P.O. AND DIST.- DHUBRI PIN- 783301 ASSAM.
3:THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR DHUBRI P.O. AND DIST.- DHUBRI PIN- 783301 ASSAM.
4:THE SUB-REGISTRAR DHUBRI P.O. AND DIST.- DHUBRI PIN- 783301 ASSAM.
5:SANTANA BORA ACS ADDL. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DHUBRI
P.O. AND DIST.- DHUBRI PIN- 783301 ASSAM. ------------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. U. K. Goswami, Advocate,
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. R. Baruah, Government Advocate : Mr. S. Dutta, Standing Counsel
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 21.07.2026
Heard Mr. U. K. Goswami, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. S. Dutta, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.1. I have
Page No.# 3/3 also heard Mr. S. R. Baruah, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4.
2. Mr. S. R. Baruah, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 submitted that the order dated 05.12.2024 which has been assailed in the instant proceedings no longer survives in view of the order passed on 03.06.2025. The learned Government Advocate further submitted that the order dated 05.12.2024 was passed without taking into consideration the order dated 17.09.2024 passed in WP(C) No.5499/2023.
3. Taking into account the said submission, nothing further remains in the instant writ petition inasmuch as the order dated 05.12.2024 is not insisted upon by the Respondents in view of the passing of the order dated 03.06.2025.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant