ABBAS @ RAHIL S/O ASLAM @ NAMMI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11597/2025 · 2025-10-03
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36804 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36804 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40174] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11597/2025 Abbas @ Rahil S/o Aslam @ Nammi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Nibheda, Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Shakir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 03/10/2025
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Abbas @ Rahil S/o Aslam @ Nammi, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.289/2024 dated 21.06.2024 registered at P.S. Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC and Section 66D of I.T. (Amendment) Act, 2008.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant, has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He also submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant-accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant
[2025:RJ-JP:40174] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-11597/2025] undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3.
Learned counsel for applicant-accused submitted that applicant-accused is an innocent person. He submits that present petitioner is named by co-accused and on the basis of name of co-accused, he has been arrayed as an accused. He further submits that both the accused named in the FIR were already granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on 26.09.2024. He further submits that the applicant does not have any criminal antecedents and is in custody since long and trial will take its time, thus, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant-accused. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On 21.06.2024, Jitendra Singh, Sub-Inspector with police picket has intercepted two persons Anjat @ Amjad and Javed for alleged involvement in cyber crime activity. After searching their phone, same is recovered and seized and a case is registered at the police station and both the petitioner accused were arrested by police. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has granted bail to Anjat @ Amjad and Javed on 26.09.2024 after filing of charge-sheet. At the time of charge-sheet, police has kept the investigation pending against present petitioner and during investigation, present
[2025:RJ-JP:40174] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-11597/2025] petitioner-accused is arrested. There is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner who was named as facilitator in commission of crime. 7. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, the Court finds that the grounds raised in support of the bail application, coupled with other facts such as absence of any apprehension regarding absconding of applicant- accused, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, it is justified to grant of bail. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Abbas @ Rahil S/o Aslam @ Nammi, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail with condition that he would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner.
(ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. [2025:RJ-JP:40174] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-11597/2025]
9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHARU SONI /42