SMT KAVITA SHARMA WIFE OF SHRI HARISH SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/1810/2025 · 2025-12-10
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36802 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36802 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50250] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.1810/2025
1. Harish Sharma, Sanchalak Of Kavita Colonizers Pvt. Ltd. Company, Resident Of C-161, Bahubali Path, Jan Path, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Ravi Sokhiya Son Of Shri Rajendra Sokhiya, Resident Of A-17, Sikar House Colony, Jhotwara Road, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Chhavi Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Ms. Vandana Aoudichya JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 10/12/2025
1. The present misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the FIR No.1187/2023 registered with Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 and 120-B IPC on the basis of compromise between the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant are in agreement that the parties have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise and now the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioner.
3. This Court vide order dated 14.11.2025 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of the
[2025:RJ-JP:50250] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1810/2025] compromise and the Investigating Officer was further directed to submit the verification report along with criminal antecedents of the petitioner.
4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order passed by this Court, the learned Public Prosecutor has furnished the verification report, which verifies that the parties have settled their dispute and the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioner.
5. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and looking to the fact that the dispute pertains to personal in nature and the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioner and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr. reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and Ors. reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688, this Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS.
6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. The impugned FIR No.1187/2023 registered with Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 and 120-B IPC stands quashed.
7. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
8. The factual report dated 03.12.2025 is ordered to be retained on record.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/269