- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3209 WP No. 34954 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 34954 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI.SYED ZAIR-UL- HAQ S/O ALTE SYED AMAN UL HAQ, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, NO. 357, 2ND STAGE, 4TH CROSS, RAJIVNAGAR, NEAR MUDA ZOO PARK, MYSORE 570 019 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K SHASHIKANTH PRASAD., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA RACPC, MYLARA ARCADE, NO. 1263-A 1264/A, GAGANA CHUMBI ROAD, (JODI BASAVA ROAD) KUVEMPURANGAR, MYSURU 570 023. REP BY CHIEF MANAGER. 2. SMT SYEDA AZHAR MADNI S/O ALTE SYED AMAN UL HAQ AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, NO. 357, 2ND STAGE, 4TH CROSS, RAJIVNAGAR, NEAR MUDA ZOO PARK, MYSORE 570 019 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BRIJESH CHANDER GURU., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3209 WP No. 34954 of 2024 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE VACATION NOTICE DTD. 11.12.2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK REF NO. HBC 40227384117/HBL- 402273837141 FILE NO. 53687 (ANNX-C).GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY FOR ALL THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VACATION NOTICE DTD. 11.12.2024 REF NO. HBC 40227384117/HBL-402273837141 FILE NO. 53687 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK (ANNX-C). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 19.12.2024 the following order was passed: “Issue emergent notice to the respondents. Interim order as prayed for is granted subject to petitioner depositing 25% of the outstanding amount due as of today to the respondent No.1 – Bank within four weeks from today, failing which, the interim order granted stands automatically vacated, and the respondent No.1- Bank is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. Re-list on 24.01.2025.” - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3209 WP No. 34954 of 2024 2. Learned counsel for the respondent - Bank submits that the petitioner has not complied with the directions issued by this Court. 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL