- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22659 WP No. 35556 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 35556 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. G.NAGARAJA S/O LATE M. GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT 'SRINIVAS SANDRA' MAJARA MELUPALLI KYASAMBALLI HOBLI KGF TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 121. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.C.BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563 101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISION KOLAR-563 101. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22659 WP No. 35556 of 2024 4. THE TAHSILDAR KGF TALUK, KGF KOLAR DISTRICT-563 121. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.4 TO CHANGE THE KHATA IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.106/1, MEASURING 5-ACRES, 38 GUNTAS AND LAND BEARING SY.NO.106/2, MEASURING 13-GUNTAS, SITUATED AT SRINIVASASANDRA VILLAGE, KYASAMBALLI HOBLI, KGF TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT AS PER THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 IN R.A.NO.511/2022 DATED 14.06.2024 AND R.A.NO.12/2022 DATED 14.06.2024 VIDE ANNEXURES-A AND B TO THE WP BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED 09.09.2024 MADE BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-G TO THE WRIT PETITION UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to consider the representation at Annexure-G to change khata in terms of the order dated 14.06.2024 in R.A.No.511/2022 and R.A.No.512/2022. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22659 WP No. 35556 of 2024 3. In that view of the matter, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, respondent No.4 is directed to consider the representation at Annexure-G in the light of the observations made above within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 4. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65