Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36798 (RAJ)

SUBASH CHAND ANDANR v. MEENAWALA GRIH NIRMAN SAHKARI

CW/10979/2015 · 2025-10-07

Maneesh Sharma

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40680] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10979/2015 1. Subash Chand S/o Shri Kundanmal, aged about 52 years, R/o Mohanpura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur Raj. Currently R/o House No. 722, Bordi Ka Rasta, Kishanpol Bazar, Jaipur Raj. 2. Anil Kumar S/o Shri Kundanmal, aged about 48 years, R/o Mohanpura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur Raj. Currently R/o House No. 722, Bordi Ka Rasta, Kishanpol Bazar, Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioners Versus Meenawala Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Registration No. 2591/L. Through its Secretary, Office Shop No.6, Shyam Market, Nemi Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Gurjar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 07/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the original suit itself has been dismissed in default and has not been restored. 2. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the present civil writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 4. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the writ petition if the original suit is restored and the cause of action still survives, subject to applicable law. 5. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-58