Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
118
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-8039-2025 Decided on:24.03.2025
Anchal Sharma
.... Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others
.... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: Mr. Anil Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana.
Tribhuvan Dahiya, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the amendment made in the Policy vide memo dated 14.12.2023.
2.
Permitted to do so.
3.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for.
24.03.2025
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) sonia
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking?
Yes/No Whether reportable?
Yes/No
SONIA BURA 2025.03.25 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document