2025:CGHC:36348 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8549 of 2025 Dr. Anju Sharma W/o Dr. Sumanta De Aged About 42 Years R/o Near Mahaveer Park Colony Near Housing Board Society Housing Society Board Mahasamund District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Agriculture Development And Farmer Welfare And Biotechnology, Ground Floor Block - 3 Indrawati Bhavan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh Pin - 492001 2 - The Director Directorate Of Veterinary Science Livestock Development Department, Ground Floor, Block No. -03, Indrawati Bhavan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Pin Code - 492002 3 - The Under Secretary Chhattisgarh Livestock Development Department, 4th Floor, Block B Indrawati Bhavan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Ms Anuja Sharma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Anmol Sharma, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 25.07.2025 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 30.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the Veterinary Hospital, Jhalap, District- Mahasamund to the Veterinary Hospital, Katghora, Korba, District-Korba. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the said transfer order, the petitioner has already made representation which is still pending before the Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.07.26 13:43:52 +0530 Wps 8549 of 2025 2 Transfer Committee. As per Clause-8 of the Transfer Policy dated 05.06.2025, there is in-house remedy for making representation against the transfer order before the Transfer Committee, who will consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. Clause-8 of the said Transfer Policy is reproduced as below: “8. स्थानांतरण से व्यथिथात शासेकीय से वकी द्वार अपनां स्थानांतरण की थिवरूद्ध अभ्याव दनां की वल स्थानांतरण नांथित की उल्लंघनां होनां पर हो उक्त उल्लंघनां होनां वल की थि की की सेबंध में$ स्पष्ट आधर की सेथा स्थानांतरण आद शा जार होनां की थितथिथा से 15 थिदवसे की भीतर प्रश्नाधनां स्थानांतरण आद शा की प्रथित सेथिहोत शासेनां द्वार गथि-त वरिरष्ठ सेथि0व की सेथिमेंथित की सेयजाकी एव सेथि0व, सेमेंन्य प्रशासेनां थिवभीग की प्रस्तु4त थिकीय जा सेकी ग। सेथिमेंथित द्वार ऐसे प्रकीरण की इसे स्थानांतरण नांथित की प्रकीशा में$ परक्षण कीरनां की पश्चात ” अपनां अनां4शासे सेबंथिधत थिवभीग की प्र थि:त की जाएग। 3. Be that as it may, since in-house remedy has been provided to the employee concerned to raise the grievances before the Transfer Committee against transfer order, this court deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to move fresh representation before the Transfer Committee along with copy of this order within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order, and the Transfer Committee, in turn, shall take a decision on the representation so made by the petitioner in accordance with law in an objective manner and pass a reasoned order on its own merits within a further period of two weeks. Till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. 4. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today to the said Transfer Committee. 5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma