Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36791 (AP)

M/S SHREE MANDALI ENTERPRISES v. SRI PIYUSH KUMAR IAS

CC/14/2025 · 2025-07-07

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010603612024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 14/2025 Between: 1. M/S SHREE MANDALI ENTERPRISES, 1-2, NAGAYALANKA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI SANAKA KOTA VENKATA RENUKA RAVI VARA PRASAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PIYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI T J H PRASAD BABU, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI CH GOPINATH, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRAINAGE DIVISION, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 19.04.2024 passed in W.P. No. 5383 of 2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMAKRISHNA PATIVADA The Court made the following: O R D E R: 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the directions issued by this Court in W.P.No.5383 of 2024 dated 19.04.2024. 2. No representation for the petitioner on earlier occasions. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the respondents that the direction issued by this Court in W.P.No.5383 of 2024 dated 19.04.2024 is complied with, no further adjudication in this matter is necessary and the contempt case is liable to be closed. 4. In the result, contempt case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same, if still aggrieved. No costs. 5. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand closed. _____________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 08.07.2025 SP 162 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 14/2025 Date: 08.07.2025 W SP