[2025:RJ-JP:27535] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 863/2025 Ritu Soni Wife Of Dhiraj Soni, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of 33/109, Varun Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2154/2023 Dhiraj Soni S/o Of Shri Satya Narayan Soni, Aged About 42 Years, R/o H.no. 103, Shopping Centre, Furniture Market, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Smt. Ritu Soni Wife Of Dhiraj Soni D/o Dayanand Soni, Aged About 41 Years, R/o 33/109, Varunpath, Mansarovar, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rudraksh Sharma Mr. Mukesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Nripendra Singh Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 23/07/2025 S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.863/2025 is filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 for directing the investigating agency to conduct the investigation in fair and impartial manner in a fixed time period i.e. within a period of 2 months in the FIR No.248/2022 dated 15.10.2022 registered with the Mahila Police [2025:RJ-JP:27535] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-863/2025] Station Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Sections 498-A, 406, 467, 468, 471, 420, 120-B IPC and S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2154/2023 is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.248/2022 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Jaipur South for the offence under Sections 498-A, 406, 467, 468, 471, 420, 120-B of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that an ex parte order in the divorce proceedings was passed in the year 2019. It is further submitted that impugned FIR is lodged in the year 2022. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the matter, this Court directs that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner- Dhiraj Soni and his family, subject to joining the investigation. Howsoever, it is made clear that the said interim protection shall remain operational till filing of the outcome of the investigation. Further, Investigation authority is directed to conduct the investigation in a fair, transparent and expedient manner and if representation is filed by the petitioner, same be considered after due analysis of the facts and circumstances, in accordance with law. In view of the above, present petitions are disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/91-92