HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11232 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Mohd. Akaram, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 81 of 2025, under Sections 3, 4, 5 & 7 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, Police Station - Seepari Bazar, District - Jhansi, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is a Barber and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence as alleged in the FIR. The main accused person Santosh Agrahari, who happens to be the proprietor of the said place, has already been granted anticipatory bail. 5. Learned counsel has also stated that the applicant is stated to be the manager of the said place but he has nothing to do with the said offence. The victims, who were recovered from the place of occurrence were major, have already been released, as such, it is a clear cut case of false implication. The applicant is languishing in jail since 28.02.2025, having no criminal history to his credit. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate with trial. 6. Per contra, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the bail application but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant and also the fact that the applicant has no criminal history. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Srivastava, Mohd. Akaram Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sumit Sahu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, nature of offence, severity of punishment and also considering the fact that the victims who were recovered from the place of occurrence were major and have already been released, prima facie I find it a fit case to release the applicant on bail. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Sumit Sahu, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during trial. ii) The applicant will not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 23, 2025 Siddhant BAIL No. 11232 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad