Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36774 (AP)

SEETHEPALLI VENKATA RAMANA v. BAJAJ FINESERV FINANCE LIMITED

WP/365/2025 · 2025-03-06

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010603982024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 365 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:- 41 [3446] Seethepalli Venkata Ramana ...Petitioner Vs. Bajaj Finserv Finance Limited and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for petitioner : Sri Srinivasa Kannamreddy Advocate for respondents : None CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 6th March 2025 P C : In view of the fact that there is an effective alternate remedy available to the petitioner by filing an application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act of 2002 (SARFAESI Act), we are not inclined to interfere at this stage by invoking our extraordinary jurisdiction. 2. The petition is dismissed. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal. No order as to costs. 2 Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J AMD 3 95 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 365 of 2025 Dt: 06.03.2025 AMD