IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE o 4: & PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 31545 OF 2024 Between: 1. Vanukuri Padmavathi, W/o. Sambi Reddy, aged 47 years. Proprietor of Sri Sai Traders, D.No.1-180, Main Road, Ankireddypalem Guntur. 2. Vanukuri Sambi Reddy, S/o. Venkata Subba Reddy, Aged 52 years Business, D.No.1-180, Main Road, Ankireddypalem, Guntur. 3. Vanukuri Bharath Reddy, S/o. Sambi Reddy, aged 28 years, D.No. 1- 180, Main Road, Ankireddypalem Guntur. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban District, Guntur. 4. The Station House Officer, Nallapadu Police Station, Guntur. 5. Anumolu Mallikarjun Rao, S/o Veeraiah, aged about 55 years, D.No.6-11-121/A, Ganesh Basthi, Kothagudem Village, Kothagudem Post, Khammam District, Telangana State. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the Cr' of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that the Respondent No. 4 nature cannot interfere in any civil disputes/ business transaction disputes between the petitioners and the 5*^ Respondent and cannot take on themselves the function of a Civil Court at the instance of Respondent No. 5 by threatening the petitioners to clear the amounts being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of Principles of Natural Justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 and their staff not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners by way of calling the petitioners to the No.4 Police Station to settle the issue with the 5 th Respondent Respondent pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A.VENKATA DURGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: ASST.GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010603292024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AWIARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No:31545 OF 2024, Between; Vanukuri Padmavathi and Others ...PETITIONERS AND ...respondents The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel tor the Petitioners: Sri Venkata Durga Rao Anantha Counsel for the Respondents: Ld. Govt. Pleader for Home The Court made the following order: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, counsel for the petitioners submits that the 4^ of the petitioners by 2. The learned respondent is disturbing the peace the petitioners though there is no complaint repeatedly calling submitted that the 4 registered against the petitioners. It is behest of the respondent, is troubling the respondent, at the petitioners to settle the differences which arose on account of -2- W.P. No.31545 of 2024 the business transaction between the petitioner and the 5^*^ respondent. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 4 submits that the 4”’ respondent received a compiaint from the 5* respondent and that the petitioners are cailed for preiiminary investigation in accordance with Section 173 B.N.S.S. and have found that there between the petitioners and the were civil disputes respondent and as such had counselled them and sent away. It is submitted that the 4'^ respondent is not interfering with the petitioner’s activities and that they were called only for preliminary investigation. 4. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed off, making it clear that the 4'^' respondent shall not disturb petitioner without following the due procedure the peace of the as contemplated under the provisions of B.N.S.S. There shall costs. 5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall Stand closed. be no order as to Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ' SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. % 3. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban District, Guntur. 4. The Station House Officer, Nallapadu Police Station, Guntur, (BY RPAD) 3. Anumolu Mallikarjun Rao, S/o Veeraiah, aged about 55 years, D.N0.6-II-I2I/A, Ganesh Basthi, Kothagudem Village, Kothagudem Post, Khammam District, Telangana State. 6. One CC to Sri A. Venkata Durga Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Three CD Copies. gi HIGH COURT DATED:07/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.31545 of 2024 X? 13 MAR 2Cr3 . Current Section . ^ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS