1 2025:CGHC:44467 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7471 of 2023 1 - Satyendra Kumar Mishra S/o Late Rangnath Mishra Aged About 54 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Revenue Inspector (Land Record) Posted At Office Of Collector (Land Record) Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Deputy Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector (Land Record) Surguja Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. N. Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 Order on Board 01/09/2025 1. This petition is preferred against orders dated 12.09.2023 & 09.02.2023. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- "10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari for quashing order dated 12.9.2023 ANNEXURE P/1 issued by the respondent no.2 in respect of petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari for quashing of transfer order dated 9.2.2023 (ANNEXURE P/2) 10.3 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Vide order dated 21.09.2023, the petitioner was granted stay by this Court. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter and considering the fact that on the strength of the aforesaid stay order, the petitioner is still continuing at his original place of posting, as such, by the afflux of time the said orders, has lost its efficacy and as such the order(s) dated 12.09.2023 & 09.02.2023 are required to be quashed and accordingly the said order under challenge is hereby quashed. 5. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to 3 pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena