[2025:RJ-JP:25448] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3021/2025 1. Mrs. Indira Meena W/o Shri Ratan Lal Meena, Resident Of 204/ A -1, MLA House, Jyoti Nagar Housing Board Flats, Lalkothi, Jaipur Rajasthan 302005. 2. Mr. Pramod Kumar S/o Ramdayal, R/o Village Chahal Post Bayana, Chahal, Bharatpur, Bayana, Rajasthan 321401. 3. Mr. Muniraj Meena S/o Bhajan Lal Meena, R/o Dujar, Bhanwara Sawai Madhopur Raj. 322212 4. Mr. Sarfaraj Khan Alias Sarfaraj Choudhary S/o Sharif Khan, R/o Jama Mazid Ke Pass, Bonli, Sawai Madhopur Raj, 322023. 5. Najiburrahaman Alias Najib Khan S/o Abdul Aziz, R/o Mohalla Kararkhani, Bonli, Sawai Madhopur, Raj- 322023 6. Vinod Meena S/o Prahlad Meena, R/o Ambe Petrol Pump Ke Samne, Bonli, Sawai Madhopur-322023. ----Accused persons/Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor, Jaipur. ---Respondent 2. Hanumat Dixit S/o Haricharan Dixit, R/o Bade Balaji Road, Dixit Colony Bonli, Sawai Madhopur, Raj-322023 ----Complainant/Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2597/2025 Jeet Ram Choudhary @ Jeetu Burdak S/o Shri Shankar Lal Choudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 92, Buradako Ki Dhani, Datooli, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 303006. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kritesh Oswal Ms. Devyani Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rahtore, P.P. [2025:RJ-JP:25448] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3021/2025] Ms. Sarah Saurabh Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/07/2025 At the outset, it is noted that identical and connected matters were listed before this Court on 22.05.2025, wherein interim protection was granted, after taking into consideration the fact of political rivalry between the disputing parties which resulted into the filing of cross-FIRs. Additionally, factors such as the petitioner belonging to the ST Community and being a lady were also given due weightage. On 22.05.2025, directions were also issued to the petitioner to participate in the investigation in the connected petition of Mr. Jeet Ram Choudhary i.e. S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 2597/2025. At this juncture, the petitioner clarified that due to certain lapse in communication, no criminal antecedents were reflected against the petitioner on 22.05.2025, whereas in actuality, one criminal antecedent is reflected against the petitioner. In this background, learned counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the petitioners on 29.05.2025 and 17.06.2025 marked their appearance before the Investigating Officer, thereby duly joining the investigation. Per contra, learned counsel for the complainant and State, in tandem, have opposed the aforementioned claims and submitted that the petitioners have not joined investigation, as and when required. Moreover, the cooperation extended on part of the [2025:RJ-JP:25448] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3021/2025] petitioners is not proper, which is reflected by the fact that complete statements of the petitioners are not yet recorded. In the foregoing facts and circumstances, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petitions with the precise direction that the petitioners shall mark their presence before the Investigating Officer on 28.07.2025 at 11:00AM. On the said date, the Investigating Officer shall record the requisite statement(s) and carry out investigation, in the manner deemed fit by the officer, in accordance with law. In the meantime, no coercive action/arrest be taken qua the petitioners. With the above said direction(s), petitions are disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Gaurav/8-9