Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36755 (JHR)

VIJAY KUMAR ALIAS BIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/459/2024 · 2025-11-28

Sri Ananda Sen

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:35625 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 459 of 2024 ------ Vijay Kumar @ Bijay Kumar, son of late Ram Deo Singh, presently resident of Flat No. 202, B2 Block, CSNRameshwaram, Tata Kandra Main Road, Opp. Indo Denish Tool Room, Chota Ghamariya, Adityapur Industrial Area, P.O and P.S Adityapur, District Saraikela- Kharsawan. ..Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Prem Ranjan, the Regional Director, Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority, office at RIADA Bhawan, Namum, Ranchi. 3. Shashi Ranjan, the Managing Director, Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority, office at RIADA Bhawan, Namum, Ranchi . ... Opp. Party(s). ----- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s) : Ms. Ranjana Rani, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Shivam U. Sahay, AC to SC Mines-II. For JIADA Mr. R.C.P. Sah & Mr. C.A. Bardhan, Advocates. ------ 08/28.11.2025: An order was passed vide order dated 23.2.2024 passed in WPS No. 5863 of 2023 to take a decision in respect of claim of the petitioner. Counsel for the opposite parties submits that the decision has already been taken which has been brought on record by filing show cause. He submits that all dues of the petitioner has already been paid. In view of the aforesaid submission, I am of the opinion that no contempt is made out. Accordingly, this contempt is dropped. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any of the action or by the impugned order passed by the opposite parties, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same by filing separate writ petition. 28th November, 2025 Anu/-Cp2. Uploaded on: 01.12.2025 (ANANDA SEN, J. )