Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36755 (AP)

CHEEDELLA SUDHAKARA RAO, v. THE STATE OF AP REP BY ITS PP HYD.,

CRLRC/421/2010 · 2025-02-03

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010602502010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 421/2010 Between: Cheedella Sudhakara Rao, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp Hyd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. MULLA SOHAIL SHAREEF The Court made the following: 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.421 of 2010 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2023 in & Crl.R.C.421 of 2010 ORDER: The present applications are filed for compromise by the petitioner and 2nd respondent respectively along with an affidavit and requested that a compromise may be recorded and set aside the conviction and sentence passed in Crl.A.No.175 of 2009 on the file of the learned District Sessions Judge, Prakasam Division, Ongole. 2. The petitions are also accompanied with a joint memo of compromise signed by the petitioner who was Accused No.1 in the case and the 2nd respondent/complainant along with the signatures of counsels for the petitioner and the 2nd respondent. The petitioner and the 2nd respondent submitted that they had voluntarily compromised the case and requested to allow the petitions. The parties have filed photo copies of their Aadhar cards in support of their identity. 3. The petitioner and the 2nd respondent/complainant in the revision are present. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2nd respondent and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, the Compromise is recorded, which is accordingly made part of this case. 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.421 of 2010 5. The petitions are allowed setting aside the conviction and sentence passed in Crl.A.No.175 of 2009 on the file of the District Sessions Judge, Prakasam Division, Ongole, and acquitting the revisionist/A1. 6. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of in terms of the compromise. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 03.02.2025 KMS 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.421 of 2010 117 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 421/2010 03.02.2024 KMS