[2025:RJ-JP:45468] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14391/2025 Imtiyaj S/o Late Shri Mohammed Naiem, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Tikoli, Police Station Runni Sehadpur, District Seetamadhi Bihar Presently Resident At D-1360 J.j. Colony, Bawana North Delhi Presently 339, 3Rd Floor, D-Block Pocket 01, B Sector A1 -4, Narela North West Delhi Presently Tenant Flat No. C-4, Room No. 1 Pocket No. 03, Sector G-8, Narela, Police Station Narela Industrial Area North Delhi. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Anish Bhadala Mr. Sunil Nehra HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 12/11/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.388/2025 registered at Police Station Sodala, District-Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 305(a) and 331(4) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the CCTV footage does not establish the presence of the petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:45468] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14391/2025] at the place of occurrence. It is further submitted that no recovery has been effected from the petitioner. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 17.10.2025 and has no criminal antecedents. It is also submitted that no custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Imtiyaj S/o Late Shri Mohammed Naiem shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/225