Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36740 (JHR)

YOGENDRA PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6604/2025 · 2025-11-20

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:34588 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.6604 of 2025 ----- 1.Yogendra Prasad, S/o Rajkumar Sahu, R/o Village- Kasiyadih, P.O.- Bakoriya & P.S.- Manika, District- Palamu 2.Jitendra Kachhap, S/o Suresh Uraon, R/o Village Churadohar P.O. Nawa, P.S. Patan, Dist- Palamu 3.Ravindra Kumar Yadav, S/o Murli Yadav, P.O. & P.S. Rajwadih, Dist Palamu 4.Rajeev Ranjan, S/o Tapeshwar Yadav, R/o Village- Lumaratbahini, P.O. Satbahini, P.S. Untari Road, Lumaratbahini, Dist Palamu 5.Mithlesh Kumar Yadav, S/o Shivnath Yadav, R/o Village Dumri, P.O. & P.S. Chainpur, Dist Palamu 6.Surendra Kumar, S/o Pravesh Paswan, R/o Village- Bishrampur, P.O. Sakaldipa, P.S. Pipra, Dist Palamu 7.Bablu Kumar, S/o Awadh Paswan, R/o Village Pachkeria, P.O. and P.S. Nawa Jaypur, Pachkeria, Dist Palamu 8.Nawal Kumar Paswan, S/o Awadhesh Paswan, R/o Village- Bhogu, P.O. Khamdih, P.S. Medininagar, Dist Palamu 9.Rakesh Kumar Singh, S/o Jay Singh, R/o Village Mandeya, P.O. Chhatarpur, P.S. Chhatarpur, Dist Palamu 10.Rohit Kumar Singh, S/o Binay Singh, R/o Village- Kajri, P.O. Nawadha, P.S. Pandwa, Dist- Palamu .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Principal Secretary, Home Department, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi 3.Deputy Commissioner Cum District Magistrate, Palamu, P.O. & P.S.- Daltonganj, Dist- Palamu 4.District Development Commissioner, Palamu, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, Dist- Palamu 5.District Security (Chowkidari) Officer, Palamu, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, Dist- Palamu 6.Circle Officer, Chainpur, Palamu 7.Circle Officer, Sadar, Medni Nagar, Palamu … Opp. Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Faisal Allam, AC to SC (Mines)-III …...... 04/ 20.11.2025: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners on instruction of his clients seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 20th November, 2025 R.S./