Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36737 (AP)

KATIKIREDDY NAGA VENKATA SREE RAMA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/31434/2024 · 2025-08-31

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010602932024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31434/2024 Between: 1. KATIKIREDDY NAGA VENKATA SREE RAMA RAO, S/O.LATE.PALLAMRAJU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, ADVOCATE,D.NO.8-257/1, TATIPAKA (V), ' DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, HOME DEPARTMENT, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P, 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AMALAPURAM, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAZOLE, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) DISTRICT, A.P. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAZOLE, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) DISTRICT, A.P. 6. KATIKIREDDY SURYA CHANDRA RAO, S/O.LATE.PALLAMRAJU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS PANCHAYAT UPA-SARPANCH, GAYATRI APARTMENT, TATIPAKA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) DISTRICT, A.P. 7. KATIKIREDDY RAJANI DEVI, W/O.SURYA CHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, GAYATRI APARTMENT, TATIPAKA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) DISTRICT, A.P. 8. KATIKIREDDY SRI LAKSHMI, W/O.LATE. RAJA RAMMOHAN SATYANARAYANAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, GAYATRI APARTMENT, TATIPAKA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) DISTRICT, A.P. 9. AKULA RAMESH, S/O.RAGHAVULU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, BUSINESS, GAYATRI APARTMENT, TATIPAKA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) 2 DISTRICT, A.P. 10. AKULA SRAVYA, W/O.RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, BUSINESS, GAYATRI APARTMENT, TATIPAKA, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) DISTRICT, A.P. 11. POSETTI GURUMURTHY BUJJI, S/O.NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, BUSINESS, TATIPAKA, RAZOLE MANDAL, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) DISTRICT, A.P. 12. YERUBANDI VENKATESWARA RAO VENKANNA, S/O.NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BUSINESS, TATIPAKA MATHAM, RAZOLE MANDAL, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA/ (ERSTWHILE EASTGODAVARI) DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V V S S N H BHUJANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ order orders or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction and nonexercise of statutory powers and duties by official Respondents 3 to 5 in relation to report dt.16.12.2024 lodged by Petitioner for the offences under Sec 3294 331 5 351 3 109 1 R/w 116 62 and 190 of BNS 2023 committed against him by Respondents 6 to 12 and their henchmen as illegal arbitrary biased unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and sheer violation under Arts 14 and 21 of Constitution of India Amar” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the dispute between both the parties is purely civil in nature. 3 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 01.09.2025 Asr 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31434 of 2024 Dt.01.09.2025 Asr