Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36732 (CHH)

SMT. RENUKA DEVI MISHRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4030/2025 · 2025-08-03

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:38249 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4030 of 2025 Smt. Renuka Devi Mishra W/o Shri Ramkrishna Mishra, D/o Late Shri Bhagwat Prasad Aged About 73 Years R/o Bandhwapara, Sarkanda, Tah. And Dist.- Bilaspur, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G. 2 - Additional Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G. 3 - Sub - Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaspur District Bilaspur, C.G. 4 - Tahsildar Bilaspur District Bilaspur, C.G. 5 - Concerned Revenue Authority Patwari, P.H. No. 21, Vill- Gatori, Tah And District Bilaspur, C.G. --- Respondent(s) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, PL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.08.05 12:40:17 +0530 2 04.08.2025 1. The present petition is filed by the petitioners with following relief(s): “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record of the Courts below. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of MANDAMUS directing the revenue authority to correct the name of the petitioner in the Revenue Records in light of order dated 30.04.2010 passed by learned Board of Revenue and memo dated 14.05.2025 issued by the respondent No. 02 and memo dated 19.05.2025 issued by the respondent No.04 and may kindly be pleased to direct the authority to expedite the mutation proceeding. 10.3 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue any writ or direction or order as deem fit in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner herein challenges the illegal action of the respondent Revenue Authority whereby they have failed to comply with the order dated 30.04.2010 passed by learned Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh Bilaspur (C.G.) as per Annexure P-1 and memo dated 14.05.2025 issued by the Additional Collector wherein in the light of earlier order dated. 30.04.2010 and 06.08.2024, the Additional Collector has directed the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) to comply with the order and the same was sent before the respondent No. 05 on 19.05.2025 for correction of Revenue Records 3 but till date he has not complied with the order passed by Higher Revenue Authorities which is illegal, improper and contrary to the law. Hence the instant petition. 3. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection on the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the facts of the case and submission made by learned counsel for the parties, on perusal of the record it reveals that on 30.04.2010, the Board of Revenue, Bilaspur (C.G.) in Revision Case No. RN/02/R-A-6/154/2010 passed the order in favour of the petitioner. On 14.08.2015, the Board of Revenue has allowed the review application in Review Case No. RW/02/R/A-6/25/2012. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed a writ petition bearing WP(227) No.913 of 2015 before this Court which has also been allowed on 06.07.2023. Thereafter on 14.05.2025, petitioner has proceeded for correction her name before the Board of Revenue and memo issued by respondents No. 2 & 3. On 19.05.2025, the Additional Tahsildar issued memo to respondent No.5 for further necessary compliance. On 25.06.2025, petitioner has made representation before the concerned revenue authority, but till today as per order of the Additional Tahsildar, correction has not been made in revenue records. Therefore, looking to the facts and circumstances of the 4 case, respondents No.4 & 5 are directed to comply with the order passed by the higher revenue authorities expeditiously preferably within a period of ‘45 day’ from the date of receipt of copy of this order, in accordance with rules, regulations and law. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the instant petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Vasant