Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36731 (RAJ)

MAHESH KUMAR YADAV S/O BHAIRULAL YADAV v. SHRI KAILASH CHAND MEENA

CCP/1101/2024 · 2025-11-20

Shubha Mehta, Sudesh Bansal

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46950-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1101/2024 in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18223/2022 1. Mahesh Kumar Yadav S/o Bhairulal Yadav, R/o 181, Shyam Vihar Extension, Near Saint Thomas School, Girdharipura, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Kamlesh Kumar Saini S/o Kanaram Saini, R/o Ward No. 19, Sri Madhopur, Sikar (Raj.) 3. Vijay Kumar Yadav S/o Radheyshyam Yadav, R/o 12-B, Chandanbari, Kalwar Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Suman Yadav D/o Satya Narayan Yadav, R/o A-24, Kalwar Road, Chandanbari, Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Mamta Saini D/o Phool Chand Saini, R/o Ward No. 6, Tehsil Khandela, Sikar (Raj.) 6. Rakesh Kumar Yadav S/o Mangilal Yadav, R/o Mela Ki Dhani, Via Kalwar, Jaipur (Raj.) 7. Hemraj Sunda S/o Madan Lal, R/o Village Prempura, Tehsil Rainwal, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Kailash Chand Meena, Acting Chairman Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Jaipur Road, Ghooghara Ghati, Ajmer (Raj.) 305001 2. Shri Ram Niwas Mehta, Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Jaipur Road, Ghooghara Ghati, Ajmer (Raj.) 305001 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission(Rpsc), Fmp9 Plus9Jv, Jaipur Rd, Ghooghara Ghati, Madarpura, Ajmer, Rajasthan-305001. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anand Sharma for Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yuvraj Samant through VC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 20/11/2025 1. Instant civil contempt petition by and on behalf of petitioners have been filed, alleging the non-compliance of the interim order dated 09.01.2023 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. [2025:RJ-JP:46950-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-1101/2024] 18223/2022, whereunder interim direction was issued to the respondents to consider the candidature of petitioners provisionally for appointment on the post of Hospital Caretaker, subject to decision of the writ petitions. 2. In response to the contempt petition, respondents have placed on record an order dated 02.09.2024 passed by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer, whereunder after considering the candidature of petitioners provisionally on merits, their final result has been kept in sealed cover. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that the order impugned has been complied with and after final decision of writ petition, result shall be declared. 4. Undisputedly, the issue of appointment of petitioners on merits, is yet to be adjudicated and writ petition by and on behalf of petitioners are pending for adjudication. 5. In view the order dated 02.09.2024 (Annexure-R1 enclosed with the reply), this Court does not find any disobedience, that too, deliberate and willful, of the interim order dated 14.05.2024, by the respondents. 6. Accordingly, the civil contempt petition is hereby dismissed, at this stage. 7. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/52