( 2025:JHHC:30599 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8876 of 2025 ------ Tausif Jawed, aged about 38 years, son of Javed Izhar, resident of Village –Pagmil, P.O. and P.S. –Sadar (Ramgarh), District – Ramgarh. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opp. Party ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratik Sen, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 26.09.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. No. 48 of 2025 arising out of Ramgarh P.S. Case No.377 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 140, 142 & 61 of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail and earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 17.06.2025 in B.A. No. 4664 of 2025. It is then submitted that the fresh ground is that the informant of the case who has been examined as P.W.1 on 09.07.2025 has categorically stated in para-7 of his deposition that the informant could not identify the petitioner though the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. So, it is crystal clear that the petitioner is not the person to whom the informant has referred in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.01.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 20 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Ramgarh, in connection with S.T. No. 48 of 2025 arising out of Ramgarh P.S. Case No.377 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 26.09.2025 Sonu/Gunjan-