J % >) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV, (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 31427 OF 2024 Between: P. Maheswar Reddy, S/o. Late Nagi Reddy, Aged 49years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o H.No.1-24, Hussainapuram H/o Kommemarri Village, Peapally Mandal, Nandyal District. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings,Velagapudi, Guntur District, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dhone, Nandyal District. The Tahsildar, Peapally Mandal, Nandyal District. The Station House Officer, Peapally PS, Peapally, Nandyal District. P. Vijaybhaskar Reddy, S/o. Late Nagi Reddy, Aged 44years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, R/o H.No. 1-1, Hussainapuram H/o Kommemarri Village, Peapally Mandal, Nandyal District. P. Vijaybhaskar Reddy, S/o. Late Nagi Reddy, Aged 44 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, R/H.No.1-1, Hussainapuram H/o Kommemarri Village, Peapally Mandal, Nandyal District. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in calling the Petitioner to the Police Station and pressurize one ♦ him to settle the dispute with the unofficial respondent of the land to an extant of Ac.0.42 cents in Sy.No.576/1D of Hussainapuram hamlet of Kommammari Village,Peapally Mandal, Nandyal Districtas illegal arbitrary unjust contrary to the procedure established by law and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India direct Respondents not to call the Petitioner to the Police to pressurize him to settle the disputes with the unofficial and consequently to Station and not respondent. ^ lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land to cents in Sy.No.576/1D of Hussainapuram hamlet of Kommammari Village,Peapally Mandal, Nandyal District, Petition. the petitioner an extant of Ac.0.42 pending disposal of the Writ Counsel for the Petltioner;SRI G SEKHAR REDDY ^ Counsel for the Respondents No.1,4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.2,3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.5,6: The Court made the following; ORDER APHC010602242024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 31427 of 2024 Between: P Maheswar Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.G SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR HOME The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction more particuiarly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in calling the Petitioner to the Police Station and pressurize him to settle the _ -J 2 dispute with the unofficial respondent of the land to an extant of Ac 0 42 cents in Sy No 576/1D of Hussainapuram hamlet of Kommammari Village Peapally Mandal Nandyal Districtas illegal arbitrary unjust contrary to the procedure established by law and in violation of Article 14 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct Respondents not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station and not to pressurize him to settle the disputes with the unofficial respondent and pass such “ 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent Police are calling the petitioner to the Police Station though no case is registered against the petitioner. 4. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the preliminary enquiry of the Police would reveal that it is a civil dispute and in that view of the matter, they will not interfere into this matter. 5. Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of 3 admission itself, without going into the merits of the case. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the interlocutory applications pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. if any, SD/- V. SAVITHRI GOWR! ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. OneCCto SRI. G. SEKHAR REDDY 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra [OUT] 4. Three C.D.Copies Advocate [OPUC] Pradesh. [OUT] Pradesh. nm I HIGH COURT DATED:03/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.31427 of 2024 CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS