APHC010602072018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 29231/2018 Between: 1. YERUKALI VIGNESH, S/O.LATE YERUKALI NAGANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, HINDU, LABOUR, R1O.16/96-22, OWKMETTA BUILDINGS, BANAGANAPALLE TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. YERUKALI SUBBAMMA, W/O. YERUKALI RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, H.NO.19/146-A, NEAR CHAKRAVATHI TALKIES, BANAGANAPALLI TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT AT VIJAYAWADA. ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, BANAGANAPALLI TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. UPPARI NEHRU, S/O.UPPARI CHOWDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. OWKMETTA BUILDINGS, TAMMADAPALLI TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. UPPARI SANKARAIAH, S/O. UPPARI CHOWDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. OWKMETTA BUILDINGS, TAMMADALAPALLI ROAD, BANAGANAPALLE TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the 2nd respondent to order the 3rd respondent for the implementation of the Order for Ad-Interim Injunction in favour of the petitioners against the respondents 4 and 5 in I.A.No.1425/2014 in 0 S.No.176/2014 on the file of Honble Junior Civil Judge, Banaganapalli, and grant such other relief or reliefs, as it deems fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MD SHARFUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the 2nd respondent to order the 3rd respondent for the implementation of the Order for Ad-Interim Injunction in favour of the petitioners against the respondents 4 and 5 in I.A.No.1425/2014 in 0 S.No.176/2014 on the file of Honble Junior Civil Judge, Banaganapalli, and grant such other relief or reliefs, as it deems fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case ...” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioners and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioners today. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent-State is in attendance. 5. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 29231 of 2018 16.07.2025 Mjl /*